Financial abuse can take the form of:
- misusing or stealing from the bank accounts of those in their care
- pressuring a person to sign a legal document, such as a guarantee or mortgage
- using a power of attorney in a way that is not in the interests of the person who granted it.
Pressure from family member or caregiver
Elderly people may face pressure from family members for financial support. For example, an adult child may pressure a parent to guarantee a loan or become a co-borrower on a loan using the parent’s house as security.
If someone is pressuring you to sign a bank document, or is accessing your accounts without your permission, contact your local bank branch. Staff will give you advice on how best to protect yourself and your banking affairs. In so doing, bank staff will also be alert to any unusual activity in your accounts.
Suspicions of financial abuse
If you suspect an elderly friend or relative is the subject of financial abuse, you may like to raise the subject diplomatically with that person. Some tentative questions can either allay or confirm your suspicions. You may wish to raise your concerns with a trusted family member. The Office for Seniors runs a free helpline (0800 32 668 65) that gives callers information about elder abuse and also connects them to support services.
Other types of financial abuse
Like all customers, older people can also be approached by individuals running financial scams. Fraudsters can make contact in person, by phone, email, or through the internet.
More information
The following organisations also deal with matters affecting the elderly:
- SuperSeniors (Office for Senior Citizens)
- Age Concern
- Commission for Financial Capability (The Retirement Commissioner).
If you suspect an elderly friend or relative is the subject of financial abuse, you may like to raise the subject diplomatically with them and encourage them to contact their local bank branch.
Bank should have been aware of fraudulent activity on account
Richmond was a victim of elder abuse for a long time before his death in May 2021. His sons had concerns about transactions made on his account before his death and passed them on to the bank in July 2020. The bank looked into the matter but allowed Richmond’s account to continue without taking any action.
CASE 2Bank had no grounds to suspect financial abuse of elderly customer
In January 2023, Penelope visited the bank where her aunt had accounts to say she believed someone living with her aunt might be financially abusing her. In July 2023, she asked the bank to again record that she was concerned about her aunt. In October 2023, she and her aunt went to a branch and had Penelope added as a signatory to the accounts. The following day, a doctor deemed her aunt incapacitated. Penelope got hold of her aunt's bank statements and found she had made payments totalling $23,000 to the person who had been living with her since January of that year.
Penelope complained that in January the bank had asked her to complete a form detailing her concerns about her aunt and assured her during that visit that it would monitor her aunt’s transactions, but it failed to follow through on its promise. As a result, she said, the bank was responsible for all the transactions in question, which she said were made under duress and without the necessary cognitive capacity on her aunt’s part.
The bank looked into her complaint and acknowledged it had put a note on her aunt’s file in July to contact the aunt about payments made on her credit card. However, the bank failed to make contact, and it acknowledged that, had it done so, it might have discovered recent transactions to the person living with her. It offered to reimburse transactions made after the July meeting, a total of $1,750. It later increased this to $3,000 in an effort to resolve the complaint. Penelope did not accept the offer, arguing the bank was liable for all the transactions made since January.
Dying wife changed access to just one account
Ravi complained to us that his bank had not carried out an instruction to add him as an account owner on all of his wife’s accounts.
Privacy & confidentiality
Banks have a legal duty to protect the confidentiality of existing and former customers. Banks also have obligations under the Privacy Act 2020, which contains 13 privacy principles about personal information. In the banking sector, these principles govern:
banks’ collection and storage of customer information
customers’ rights to access and correct information about themselves
the disclosure of …
Anti-money laundering - changes to banking
The Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 obliges New Zealand’s financial institutions and businesses to detect and deter money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The Act, which came into full force in 2013, also requires banks to gather more information about customers than previously. This can be inconvenient to some customers, but is a legal requiremen…
Credit laws and banking
Banks' obligationsConsumer credit contracts legislation covers most of the lending-related complaints we investigate. A consumer credit contract will exist whenever a bank lends to a customer for personal use, such as through a mortgage, credit card, arranged overdraft or personal loan. Such contracts typically take the form of a customer agreement (such as a home loan agreement) or the standard t…
Updated December 2024