Illness, injury, unemployment, a relationship breakup and over-commitment can put stress on your finances. Being unable to meet your repayments can also be worrying. Banks can help you, but it's important they know before things get too serious. We've had hardship-related complaints that might have been resolved much earlier if the complainant had simply talked to the bank.
How banks can help
If your financial situation has changed and you can no longer make loan repayments, the bank may be able to extend the term of your loan, adjust repayment amounts or give you a loan repayment deferral, that is, temporarily halt repayments (see below). But this last option may not be in your best interests if your finances are unlikely to improve in the short term (three to six months). It may merely delay an unavoidable default, by which time you will owe even more. Selling an asset may be a better option. Seek financial advice on this and other options for managing your debt.
Loan repayment deferral
If your bank agrees to a loan repayment deferral, you don't have to make any repayments during the agreed period. Despite the temporary relief this provides, you will end up owing even more because interest continues to be added to your debt. At the end of the deferral period, you will have to increase repayments to repay the loan within the original term or extend the term of the loan.
Before taking up this option, make sure you know:
- the total amount owing on your loan at the end of the deferral period
- your new repayment amount
- the new term of your loan (if it is to change).
Bank obligations to help
Banks are not obliged to help their customers, but they are obliged to consider offering help to them. The Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 entitles borrowers in financial hardship to ask their lender to change their contract, such as by a loan repayment deferral or an extension to the term of the loan, or both. This applies even if borrowers are in default on repayments. However, borrowers must have been in default for less than two months and have missed no more than four consecutive payments. Borrowers must also explain in writing why they can’t make their repayments (for example, because of illness, injury, loss of employment or the break-up of a relationship).
Banks must give proper consideration to hardship applications. We consider proper consideration to include:
- ensuring it has all necessary information to assess the application
- considering a customer’s entire financial position
- taking into account legitimate considerations applicable to the customer’s circumstances
- having a bank-wide policy dealing with the application in a timely fashion
- documenting its decision-making process
- providing the customer with reasons for its decisions.
Banks must also:
- comply with lender responsibility principles when assessing the application
- acknowledge the application within five working days and give its decision within 20 working days
- give reasons in writing when they decline applications.
- In the end, banks are free to make their own commercial decisions about whether to agree to alternative repayment arrangements. However, banks are typically open to helping customers overcome their financial problems, particularly if approached early.
Further steps
You can come to us if you're not satisfied with the outcome of your application (your bank must be a member of our scheme). We may be able to look at service or communication-related aspects of the application process, but we do not have the power to challenge the outcome, which is invariably a matter of commercial judgement.
If your lender is not a member of our scheme, it must be a member of another dispute resolution scheme. See the Companies Office website. The Insolvency and Trustee Service may also be able to help. If you think your lender has unfairly declined your hardship application, you can ask the courts or Disputes Tribunal to change the terms of your contract.
You can get free and confidential budgeting advice from MoneyTalks.
If your financial situation has changed and you are unable to meet your repayments, it’s important to notify your bank before things get too serious – they may be able to help.
Inadequate security left bank liable for customer’s $56,000 loss
In 2022, Randolph's son accessed his mobile phone using the passcode and added his own face to the Face ID function. He was then able to access Randolph's mobile banking app using the Face ID function and made 26 transactions totalling $56,000 without any further authentication steps. The bank declined to reimburse Randolph, who complained to us that the bank had insufficient security steps in place to keep his banking secure. He also considered he had taken all reasonable steps to protect his banking credentials and therefore had not breached the bank’s terms and conditions.
CASE 2Bank fell short in responding to customer in financial difficulties
Summer had been in arrears on her home loan and three credit cards since 2022. She complained that the bank had failed to help her through her financial hardship. Specifically, she said the bank failed to act on her requests to change the loan to interest-only repayments and discouraged her from applying for a top-up to the loan so she could consolidate her credit card debts. She also said the bank’s failure to respond to correspondence resulted in the transfer of her accounts to the bank’s debt recovery team. More generally, the bank’s lack of communication and inaction had exacerbated her arrears, left her unable to qualify for hardship under the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003, resulted in extra interest charges, and caused her stress and inconvenience.
CASE 3Bank erred by topping up struggling customer’s loan
In August 2021, Asher’s bank approved his application for a $7,500 top-up to his personal loan, which at the time stood at about $8,100. Soon afterwards, he began to experience financial difficulties and was unable to keep up with the payments due on the loan and his credit card. He later injured himself and couldn’t work. He sought help from a financial mentor, who questioned whether the bank should have given him the top-up. The financial mentor complained to the bank. The bank maintained that Asher could afford the higher repayments at the time it had approved the top-up. Asher asked us to investigate.
Privacy & confidentiality
Banks have a legal duty to protect the confidentiality of existing and former customers. Banks also have obligations under the Privacy Act 2020, which contains 13 privacy principles about personal information. In the banking sector, these principles govern:
banks’ collection and storage of customer information
customers’ rights to access and correct information about themselves
the disclosure of …
Financial abuse of the elderly
Financial abuse can take the form of:
misusing or stealing from the bank accounts of those in their care
pressuring a person to sign a legal document, such as a guarantee or mortgage
using a power of attorney in a way that is not in the interests of the person who granted it.
Pressure from family member or caregiver
Elderly people may face pressure from family members for financial support. For …
Anti-money laundering - changes to banking
The Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 obliges New Zealand’s financial institutions and businesses to detect and deter money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The Act, which came into full force in 2013, also requires banks to gather more information about customers than previously. This can be inconvenient to some customers, but is a legal requiremen…
Updated December 2024