Our investigation
We considered the bank appropriately applied its policy on referring her to a special care team. A separation is not in itself grounds for such a referral. However, matters changed after a repayment bounced a second time and the conversations with Peggy changed. The bank staff then offered to make a referral.
We also considered the bank offered – and explained – the usual range of options for protecting her account. However, on checking Peggy's credit record, we discovered it was not affected by the missed mortgage repayments because it was the trust that had the mortgage with the bank. The bank had given Peggy incorrect information and caused her considerable stress. Peggy had relied on what the bank told her about her credit rating, and her lawyer had used this in separation negotiations, undermining her credibility during the negotiations. The bank increased its offer to $5,000.
Outcome
Peggy accepted the bank’s offer.
Print this page