Our investigation
We found that refunding the interest and refixing the loan for another six months restored Polly to her original position, meaning she suffered no financial loss. We also found the payment of $2,378 was sufficient to compensate her for the short inconvenience she suffered – even though the way the bank communicated this offer was unclear. Finally, we found the bank was not responsible for the delay in refixing the loan because Polly did not respond to the bank’s numerous attempts to get her consent to proceed with the change.
Outcome
We did not uphold Polly’s complaint.
Print this page