Our investigation
The bank gave us its copy of the journal log, but we found it contained information recorded at the ATM terminal an hour after Zack had used it. The journal log appeared to be an automatic report and strongly suggested to us that neither the bank nor the ATM provider had fully investigated the matter. We had previously dealt with cases where cash had fallen into a cavity inside the machine, and other instances where funds had been found during maintenance. The journal log did not confirm the ATM balanced at the end of the day, or that the machine was checked for missing money. We considered the bank had not satisfactorily disproved Zack’s claim and told the bank so.
Outcome
The bank offered Zack $1,000, an offer he accepted.
Print this page