Our investigation
Banks must keep customer information secure and verify the identity of customers to prevent fraud. When Georgia called the bank, it used its standard manual verification process, which was to ask to four questions, only one of which could be unanswered or answered incorrectly. Staff had no ability to change the questions or exercise discretion. In Georgia's case, the staff member asked three questions, two of which she could not answer. The first question, about when she opened a specific account, was a difficult one, and it was unlikely most long-standing customers could answer it. However, the other questions were not difficult. Contrary to what Georgia asserted, she did not lose access to online banking after failing the verification process.
We found the bank's verification process did not breach a duty or obligation owed to Georgia. However, we suggested the bank review its verification policy and questions, having regard to its Code of Banking Practice obligation to do its best to meet the needs of older and disabled customers.
Outcome
We did not uphold Georgia's complaint.
Print this page