Our investigation
We found the bank had no duty to check the certificate’s authenticity. In any case, the differences between an authentic certificate and the one supplied to the bank were slight and certainly not significant enough that the bank should have noticed them and taken follow-up action. In short, the bank had no reason to doubt the certificate’s authenticity.
The bank’s request for the certificate was part of being a responsible lender. Its home loan document was clear about the need for a certificate, saying: “If you are using a loan for construction, you must take out builders’ risk insurance with an insurer approved by us with our interest as mortgagee noted on the policy.” The certificate named the bank as an interested party, as required.
Outcome
Janet withdrew her complaint.
Print this page