Bank failed to explain that approval of loan change was conditional only

Categories:
Advice & information, Instructions not followed, Lending,
Summary:
In January 2023, Luther arranged a loan with the bank secured by two vehicles. However, the bank agreed, via the motor vehicle dealer who sold Luther the second vehicle, to split the loan into two separate loans, each secured by one of the vehicles. The bank also agreed to a shorter term for one of the loans. Luther signed new loan agreements and stopped making payments on the original loan, which he believed was now invalid, and waited for the bank to start deducting payments due on the new loans.
Published:
September 2025

However, the bank did not act on the new loan agreements, and Luther did not make any payments to the bank. After 18 months, the bank repossessed both vehicles. Luther complained that the bank failed to restructure the loan as agreed and asked for the vehicles to be returned and the lending arrangements corrected.

Our investigation

We looked at the communication between the bank, the dealer and Luther and learned the bank had only conditionally approved splitting the single loan into two loans, but had not clearly communicated this fact. Nor had the bank resolved the matter when Luther raised it. However, we considered it unreasonable for Luther to stop making any payments. 

Outcome

The bank offered to restructure the original loan in to two loans at a lower interest rate, resulting in an interest saving of $7,700. It also waived repossession costs of $3,259 and agreed that Luther could retrieve the vehicles. Luther accepted this offer.

Print this page