Customer did not qualify for hardship assistance, but bank’s handling of request inadequate

Categories:
Hardship and financial difficulty,
Summary:
In 2017, Jude’s bank lent his property-holding company money to buy a home. Jude also had another company which, among other things, supplied the local area's tank water. This company generated his regular income. However, his tank water company suffered a series of setbacks. After he received the loan, he asked the bank for hardship assistance, to which he said the bank did not respond adequately.
Published:
March 2025

Our investigation  

We found several instances where the bank failed to communicate adequately with Jude after he sought assistance. But regardless, we considered the bank would not have agreed to his request because such assistance is intended to be short-term only, whereas the tank water company’s difficulties were long-term in nature. A deferral of payments for three to six months, or an extension of the term of the loan, would not have helped Jude overcome his financial difficulties.  

However, we considered the bank’s continued failure to respond appropriately to his request, including giving him wrong information about eligibility for hardship assistance, caused him stress and inconvenience, particularly since it affected his ability to plan his company’s finances.  

Outcome 

The bank offered Jude $4,000 to compensate for the stress and inconvenience he had suffered. He accepted the offer.

Print this page