Elderly customer’s big cash withdrawal should have prompted questions

Categories:
Financial abuse of the elderly, Fraud & scams,
Summary:
In May 2024, Patsy, an 86-year-old widow, received a call from someone who said he was from the police and needed her help to investigate fraud. He instructed her to withdraw $20,000 from her bank account in cash and pass it to a police courier. He emphasised that this was a covert operation and she must not tell anyone about the purpose of the withdrawal.
Published:
January 2025

Patsy went to her local branch and withdrew $20,000 in cash. Patsy had no history of making large cash withdrawals, but this did not prompt the bank to ask why she was withdrawing such a large sum in cash. Patsy gave the money to a courier as instructed.

When Patsy told her daughter what had happened, her daughter said she had been scammed. Her daughter contacted the police and the bank. She asked the bank to reimburse her mother’s loss, saying the cash withdrawal was out of character, but the bank refused. It said it had no reason to suspect Patsy was caught up in a scam, and she was responsible for the withdrawal.

Our investigation

In our experience, most banks would usually ask a customer of Patsy’s age and lack of previous history of large withdrawals about the purpose of her withdrawal. However, Patsy’s memory of the events was vague, and she said she wasn't sure how she would have responded if the bank had asked about the reason for the withdrawal.  We therefore could not be satisfied the loss would have been prevented had the bank asked her about the purpose of withdrawal.

Outcome

The bank offered to reimburse 60 per cent of the loss, or $12,000. Patsy accepted the offer.

 

Print this page