Our investigation
We reviewed the bank’s call notes and found the staff member’s communication fell short. The staff member had questioned Suki’s spending habits in an insensitive manner. The bank had ignored Suki’s request that this person never call her again. It had also reversed transactions and cancelled the force payment function without notice. All in all, the bank’s communication had been poor. Also, the bank deducted nearly $280 a fortnight too much after the repayment holiday ended, causing three payments to be dishonoured and the payment deduction authority to be cancelled. When the bank set up a new authority in November, it inevitably used a new reference number, but dismissed Suki’s numerous – and justified – inquiries about the change. Her arrears grew, along with her stress.
Outcome
We recommended compensation for stress and inconvenience of $2,500, the refunding of a small amount of interest, and the capitalising of most of her $3,800 arrears to her loan. Suki accepted this.
Print this page