Our investigation
We found the bank had approved the loan based on quotes for building the pool and modular unit, as well as on a registered valuer’s estimate of the value the improvements would make to the couple's property, which was the security for the loan. The loan agreement said the bank's variable interest rate would apply until the couple obtained a code compliance certificate from their council and a completion certificate from a registered valuer, at which point the bank would switch the loan to a fixed interest rate.
We learned that when the bank heard their concerns about the construction company, it agreed to fix the interest rate on the amount they had borrowed up to that point – provided they completed a loan restructuring application, a request we considered fair and reasonable, but one the couple did not act on.
We also learned that various factors led to the bank’s delay in fixing the interest rate. The couple had built the modular unit but not the pool, and they did not want to get acompletion certificate from a registered valuer. Despite this, and after correspondence stretching over a month, the bank agreed to accept an online valuation of the property and also to backdate fixing the interest rate to just before the council issued a code compliance certificate.
Outcome
The bank offered $250 for inconvenience, and the couple accepted the offer.
Print this page