Our investigation
We considered whether the damage, losses and stress Liam described could be directly linked to the bank’s error. Liam’s company had been liquidated shortly before the letters were sent. The liquidator’s first report showed the business had stopped trading in December 2024 and had unpaid debts. This was publicly available information. The resolved debt related to a vehicle that was repossessed in July 2024 after the repossession agent visited the same addresses later used by the debt collector. This meant some of the matters raised with him might not have been caused by the debt collector letters.
Compensation is intended to put a customer back in the position he or she would have been in if the bank had not made a mistake. To award compensation, we need evidence that a bank’s error directly caused the consequences claimed by the customer. In Liam’s case we had none. We told Liam that, in our view, the bank's offer seemed fair and reasonable.
Outcome
Liam accepted the bank's offer.
Print this page